In
the race to become bigger in a media world being disrupted by changes in
technology and viewer preferences, it looks like TV station groups, Sinclair
Broadcast and Tribune Media, will be searching for new suitors, starting
tomorrow. August 8th is the
deadline for the parties to walk away from their $3.9 billion merger, something
that, after the FCC’s July 26th decision to refer its public
interest review of the merger to an administrative law judge, became more
likely they would do.
TV
Groups say they need greater scale to use as leverage with advertisers and
multichannel video programming distributors(MVPDs) as advertisers have more
outlets to choose from putting downward pressure on ad prices and MVPDs,
through consolidation, are bigger and have more heft in negotiating retransmission
agreements that work best for them.
But,
how much scale is necessary? As separate entities, Sinclair and Tribune have
184 and 40 major network affiliate stations in 89 and 33 markets,
respectively. Sinclair is in 37 percent
of US households, while Tribune is in 44 percent. I imagine they already have strong bargaining
positions with small businesses looking to place ads on local TV channels. I imagine they already have mutually dependent
relationships with broadcasters, ones that neither party at the negotiating
table wants to risk upsetting. I imagine
they don’t need much national scale to produce local news.
Network
Affiliates
|
||
Affiliation
|
Tribune
|
Sinclair
|
ABC
|
3
|
30
|
CBS
|
6
|
25
|
CW
|
12
|
37
|
FOX
|
14
|
43
|
MY Network
|
3
|
31
|
NBC
|
2
|
18
|
Total Major Network Affiliates
|
40
|
184
|
Source: 10K Reports
Size
(and dominance) can easily become inefficient and harmful to consumers in the
form of higher prices, fewer choices, and less innovation. It may also add to the temptation and ease of
cooperating with the few remaining firms in the industry on shared interests such
as higher advertising prices (as is being investigated allegedly by the DOJ.) It raises the question of whether these
station group mergers (another one is the $3.65 billion Gray and Raycom deal) are
ploys to convert local markets into national ones to spread costs across more
units or spread agendas.
Sidebar:
Television programming, aggregated
by broadcast and cable networks is provided via broadcast or multichannel
subscription services. If a household
only wants to watch broadcast network programming, the over-the-air signals can
be picked-up for free by using an antenna and a tuner that transmit the Very
High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) signals. Broadcast spectrum is licensed by the FCC on
an 8-year renewable term to individual and group owners to serve the public
interest of communities within designated metropolitan areas (DMAs). In 2015, there were 210 DMAs, of which 183
had three or more full-power commercial television stations assigned to them. In many of the largest DMAs, the top
broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, and FOX) own and operate their own
stations. Programming on local
television stations comes from the broadcast networks, purchases of syndicated
television shows, and production of original content, such as local newscasts
and coverage of local and regional events.
Broadcast TV
stations transmit over two alternative broadcast bands – very high frequency
(VHF) or ultra high frequency (UHF). Nationwide,
the maximum percentage of U.S. households that a television group can serve is
39 percent. The cap discounts the
audience reach by 50% if UHF technology was used prior to 2009, because it
historically had weaker over-the-air signals compared to VHF. In 2016, the FCC grandfathered the UHF rule
stating that it was outdated given the conversion to digital broadcasting in
2009. However, in April of 2017, the FCC
restored the practice of discounting and the rule change was upheld in Court on
appeal.
While ad-supported
local broadcast TV stations provide their programming free over the air, 86
percent of households receive these stations through the paid subscriptions of
MVPD providers (cable, direct broadcast satellite (DBS), and telecom firms) who
bundle broadcast and cable networks into program tiers. Local
broadcasters are given the option of either demanding carriage on their local
MVPD systems (Must-Carry or Carry One, Carry All) or negotiating with those
systems for compensation for carriage (Retransmission Consent). If the broadcaster elects Must-Carry status,
then they are generally guaranteed carriage and no compensation is
involved. The arrangement is negotiated
every three years and typically smaller stations choose Must-Carry status. Larger broadcasters prefer Retransmission
Consent because they receive cash or in-kind compensation from cable operators
that find it necessary to carry the major networks to attract and retain
subscribers. On average, nearly a
quarter of broadcast station’s revenues comes from fees paid by MVPDs. TV stations typically share a portion of the
retransmission consent fees with their broadcast network affiliate.
No comments:
Post a Comment