Friday, August 30, 2019

Starz: What do you prefer first…the good news or the bad news?


The good news today for Starz, owned by Lions Gate Entertainment, was its announcement of a signed multi-year, multi-million dollar affiliate agreement with AT&T to distribute its premium television content, Starz, over AT&T’s satellite (DirecTV) and telecommunication/internet (U-verse, AT&T TV) services.  In a year where distributors and content owners are engaged in a record-breaking number of contract disputes and blackouts (200 through the end of August), a deal is very good news.  This is especially through for Lions Gate with AT&T, as AT&T represents more than 10% of Lions Gate’s revenue (according to its most recent 10K report, FY ending 3/31/2019).

Today’s bad news is that Comcast, a distributor of Starz’s content but also a competitor with plans to launch its own direct-to-consumer streaming service next year (that will be free to its 50+ million PayTV subscribers), leaked that it will stop carrying Starz at year end when their affiliate agreement expires.  In spite of the hoopla surrounding cord-cutting and the increase in popularity of its own streaming service (over 4 million subs in August), distribution via PayTV is a must for a premium channel like Starz with 26.5 million subscribers.  Loss of Comcast, the second largest MVPD (after AT&T), would be devasting.  

So, game on!  How likely is it that Comcast will drop Starz from its lineup?  That depends on what Lions Gate does next.  It needs to get scooped up quickly by CBS (or AT&T) so that it can gain scale and push-back in contract negotiations over the next four-months with Comcast and with other distributors in the months and years ahead.  A good call would be for Lions Gate to re-initiate interest in Starz with CBS and other potential suitors before time runs out.  (Note: Lions Gate’s passed on a $5 billion offer made by CBS for Starz about a month ago.  Lions Gate paid $4.4 billion for Starz in 2016.)  

Friday, August 23, 2019

Is Scale Everything?


On the August 6th Investor Call, Bob Iger, Disney’s CEO, conveyed that the firm is in discussions with distribution partners such as Apple, Amazon, and Google to supplement its direct-to-consumer streaming offerings “to achieve scale relatively quickly.”  Without a doubt, Disney will ramp up quickly and present a formidable competitive threat to the market leader, Netflix. 

For Netflix, scale is also important.  With high fixed costs for content licensing and creation, Netflix “needs” more subscribers to spread out those costs.  For five of the past eight years (2011-2018), the annual growth in Netflix’s global subscriber count outpaced the increase in content expenditure lowering the per unit (subscriber) cost of content.

Period Ending
Streaming Content Obligations (000)
Global Paid Subscribers (000)
Content Cost/Sub ($)
12/31/2018
 $     19,285,875
      139,259
 $ 138.49
12/31/2017
 $     17,694,642
      110,644
 $ 159.92
12/31/2016
 $     14,479,487
         89,090
 $ 162.53
12/31/2015
 $     10,902,231
         70,839
 $ 153.90
12/31/2014
 $       9,451,112
         54,476
 $ 173.49
12/31/2013
 $       7,252,161
         44,350
 $ 163.52
12/31/2012
 $       5,633,685
         33,267
 $ 169.35
12/31/2011
 $       3,907,198
         21,600
 $ 180.89
SSoSource: Netflix's 10K reports.


But, Netflix has some exposure to “new” competitors like Disney, NBC Universal, WarnerMedia and ViacomCBS that release content across multiple distribution channels like the box office.  The cost savings these firms get from economies of scope, that is creating, acquiring, and marketing content and distributing it over multiple platforms will add to Netflix’s vulnerability to competitive threats and may slow its growth.  Let’s see how Netflix responds.


Thursday, August 22, 2019

Churn baby churn!


Two hours.  That is how long it took to “chat” with a Verizon representative and have some minor changes made to my account.  (In fact, the issue is not completely resolved.  But, I decided to de-couple a second issue and make it tomorrow’s headache.)

It made me wonder how long it would take if I wanted to cancel my account and establish one with another provider (of wireless, internet, and/or pay-tv/streaming).  Verizon and its competitors pride themselves in their low “churn rates”.  I truly believe that more customers don’t switch providers because it is too hard to do so and not because they are happy campers.  In essence, these firms hook us with attractive offers and then make it very difficult to wiggle off that hook. 

What if, however, we are determined to make the switch.  A crucial step is deciding what to switch to.  While wireless and broadband choices are few, the number of plans offered by each is daunting.  Then, if you want to add on entertainment services, you can become overwhelmed quickly and feel great uncertainty (and unhappiness) in making the “right” choice. 

One alternative to Verizon in every market is AT&T (DirecTV).  For that one firm, here is what you see when you go to the website:
Package Name
Channel (minimum)
Mo. Price ($)
Broadcast Channels
Notes
Streaming (internet)- AT&T TV Now
Plus
45
50
Y
HBO incl.; Starz, Cinemax, Showtime = $11/mo
Max
60
70
Y
HBO & Cinemax incl.; Starz Showtime = $11/mo
Entertainment
65
93
Y
Choice
85
110
Y
Xtra
105
124
Y
Ultimate
125
135
Y
Starz included
Pay-TV - Price good for first 12-months, 24-month agreement (early termination fees apply)
Select
155
60
Y
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz incl. for 1st 3-mo only
Entertainment
160
65
Y
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz incl. for 1st 3-mo only
Choice
185
70
Y
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz incl. for 1st 3-mo only
Xtra
235
80
Y
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz incl. for 1st 3-mo only
Ultimate
250
85
Y
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz incl. for 1st 3-mo only
Premier
330
135
Y
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz incl. for 1st 3-mo only
where AT&T available, $10 off per month inf bundle TV package with internet

So, what do “we” do?  We stay with our current provider.  Who wins?  “They” do.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

When it is not enough!

About a week ago, the long-awaited, least-anticipated merger of CBS and Viacom was announced.  One of the primary business reasons for the merger was to have a “library of content with incredible breadth and depth, and a reinforced capability to produce premium and popular content at scale” (Bob Bakish, CEO of Viacom).  But, will it be enough.  

As a broadcast network CBS has consistently been ranked #1.  (The exception was 2018 when NBC took over the top spot as a result of airing Super Bowl 52 and the Winter Olympics.)
MEDIA FIRM
2018 VIEWERS
2017 VIEWERS
Comcast
7,876,000
7,224,000
ViacomCBS
7,385,000
7,975,000
Disney
5,423,000
5,595,000
FOX
4,401,000
4,701,000

As a distributor of content on Pay-TV channels, ViacomCBS content doesn’t fair as well.  According the Nielsen ratings for 2018, The CW and Nickelodeon were the only two ViacomCBS channels in the top 20.  (Note: Nick at Nite was #25, MTV was #28, and Comedy Central was #49.)
MEDIA FIRM
PAY-TV CHANNEL
2018 VIEWERS
FOX
Fox News
2,481,000
NBCU
MSNBC
1,789,000
Disney
ESPN
1,764,000
Comcast
USA Network
1,518,000
Discovery
HGTV
1,461,000
Univision
Univision
1,448,000
ViacomCBS
The CW
1,418,000
AT&T WarnerMedia
TBS
1,393,000
Ion Media
Ion
1,350,000
AT&T WarnerMedia
TNT
1,323,000
A&E Networks
History
1,239,000
Comcast
Telemundo
1,216,000
Crown Media
Hallmark Channel
1,190,000
Discovery
Discovery
1,178,000
Discovery
Investigation Discovery
1,102,000
Discovery
TLC
1,066,000
A&E Networks
A&E
1,013,000
AT&T WarnerMedia
CNN
986,000
Discovery
Food Network
984,000
ViacomCBS
Nickelodeon
932,000

As a movie producer (Viacom’s Paramount), the firm is consistently in the middle-of-the-pack with increasing market share separation from Disney at #1.
MEDIA FIRM
STUDIO
2018 Domestic Box
Office Share (%)
Disney
Buena Vista
26
AT&T Warner Media
Warner Brothers
16.3
Comcast
Universal
14.9
Sony
Sony Entertainment
11.3
News Corp
20th Century Fox*
10.3
ViacomCBS
Paramount
6.4
Lionsgate
Lionsgate
3.3
STX Entertainment
STX Entertainment
2.3

ViacomCBS does have millions of subscribers on Showtime and CBS Access offered as stand-alone direct-to-consumer services and add-ons through third-party apps/distributors.
The question is can ViacomCBS scale, bundle, and leverage relationships for cost synergies and revenue generation to compete in the increasingly consolidated entertainment industry with well-financed competitors with valuable content of their own?  It’s hard to say, but it would be less questionable if the newly combined firm scooped up some additional content from the likes of Discovery, Lionsgate, and/or Sony Entertainment.  All it takes is more money!







Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Content is EXPENSIVE


In a matter of nine years, Netflix’s obligations for streaming content ballooned to $19.3 billion in 2018 (from $1.3 billion in 2010).  And, by no means will 2018 be the peak.  With increased competition coming from the likes of Disney (with Hulu), ViacomCBS, NBCUniversal, WarnerMedia (with HBO), and now Apple TV, Netflix is expected to spend close to $15 billion in original content in 2019.  

Going forward, though, it may be less about Netflix’s ability to stay on top of the streaming world and more about how the likes of ViacomCBS will be able to make headway in an increasingly crowded, fragmented market that costs a lot of money (scale) to participate in.

Period Ending
Streaming Content Obligations (000)
12/31/2018
 $     19,285,875
12/31/2017
 $     17,694,642
12/31/2016
 $     14,479,487
12/31/2015
 $     10,902,231
12/31/2014
 $       9,451,112
12/31/2013
 $       7,252,161
12/31/2012
 $       5,633,685
12/31/2011
 $       3,907,198
12/31/2010
 $       1,299,176
Source: Netflix’s 10K reports