On the August 6th Investor Call, Bob Iger, Disney’s
CEO, conveyed that the firm is in discussions with distribution partners such
as Apple, Amazon, and Google to supplement its direct-to-consumer streaming offerings
“to achieve scale relatively quickly.” Without
a doubt, Disney will ramp up quickly and present a formidable competitive
threat to the market leader, Netflix.
For Netflix, scale is also important. With high fixed costs for content licensing
and creation, Netflix “needs” more subscribers to spread out those costs. For five of the past eight years (2011-2018),
the annual growth in Netflix’s global subscriber count outpaced the increase in
content expenditure lowering the per unit (subscriber) cost of content.
Period Ending
|
Streaming Content Obligations (000)
|
Global Paid Subscribers (000)
|
Content Cost/Sub ($)
|
12/31/2018
|
$
19,285,875
|
139,259
|
$ 138.49
|
12/31/2017
|
$
17,694,642
|
110,644
|
$ 159.92
|
12/31/2016
|
$
14,479,487
|
89,090
|
$ 162.53
|
12/31/2015
|
$
10,902,231
|
70,839
|
$ 153.90
|
12/31/2014
|
$
9,451,112
|
54,476
|
$ 173.49
|
12/31/2013
|
$
7,252,161
|
44,350
|
$ 163.52
|
12/31/2012
|
$
5,633,685
|
33,267
|
$ 169.35
|
12/31/2011
|
$
3,907,198
|
21,600
|
$ 180.89
|
SSoSource: Netflix's 10K reports.
But, Netflix has some exposure to “new” competitors like
Disney, NBC Universal, WarnerMedia and ViacomCBS that release content across multiple
distribution channels like the box office.
The cost savings these firms get from economies of scope, that is
creating, acquiring, and marketing content and distributing it over multiple
platforms will add to Netflix’s vulnerability to competitive threats and may
slow its growth. Let’s see how Netflix
responds.
No comments:
Post a Comment