Thursday, July 21, 2016

AFFORDABLE Broadband for ALL by 2020

Can it be done?  Hillary Clinton, if elected, promises that 100% of households will have access to affordable broadband service by 2020.  She has indicated that $275 billion dollars in continued funding of government programs such as Connect America, Rural Utilities Services, and Broadband Technology Opportunities will support that goal.  The private sector is also part of the solution as Google Fiber will enter more communities and cable operators, like Comcast, will upgrade their data over cable networks. 

But, there remains a digital divide.  In urban communities, only 4% of the population is without access to high speed broadband.  Why?  The economics of installing/upgrading broadband networks works for private firms in high population density areas.  The same is not true in rural communities where, on average, 39% of the population is currently without access to high-speed broadband.  Why?  In rural communities, the population density averages 17.5 persons per square mile, compared to 2,438 in urban markets.  There is no incentive.  Will the government’s “commitment” be enough?



% of Urban Pop. w/o access
% of Rural Pop. w/o access
Access % Difference: Rural - Urban
Population Density - Rural
Population Density - Urban
Pop Density Difference: Urban - Rural
United States
4%
39%
35%
17.5
2,437.7
2,420.3
Alabama
6%
41%
35%
40.6
1,333.1
1,292.5
Alaska
5%
67%
62%
0.4
1,915.6
1,915.1
Arizona
8%
63%
55%
5.9
2,841.7
2,835.9
Arkansas
7%
48%
41%
25.0
1,588.8
1,563.9
California
2%
61%
59%
12.2
4,484.2
4,472.0
Colorado
4%
53%
49%
6.7
3,043.5
3,036.8
Connecticut
1%
1%
0%
142.0
1,753.6
1,611.5
Delaware
2%
10%
8%
102.5
1,926.1
1,823.6
Florida
4%
29%
25%
37.9
2,450.3
2,412.3
Georgia
4%
25%
21%
46.8
1,627.1
1,580.3
Hawaii
0%
22%
22%
18.4
3,331.3
3,312.9
Idaho
4%
55%
51%
5.6
2,434.6
2,429.0
Illinois
4%
56%
52%
26.4
2,947.6
2,921.3
Indiana
5%
52%
47%
52.8
1,933.6
1,880.8
Iowa
4%
37%
33%
18.3
2,200.3
2,182.1
Kansas
5%
49%
44%
8.0
2,344.5
2,336.5
Kentucky
3%
34%
31%
47.6
1,877.1
1,829.4
Louisiana
8%
50%
42%
29.3
1,720.1
1,690.8
Maine
4%
17%
13%
27.1
1,442.7
1,415.7
Maryland
3%
13%
10%
96.5
2,607.0
2,510.5
Massachusetts
2%
10%
8%
108.7
2,047.7
1,939.0
Michigan
3%
37%
34%
46.5
2,037.1
1,990.5
Minnesota
1%
43%
42%
17.4
2,405.7
2,388.3
Mississippi
9%
60%
51%
32.9
1,363.2
1,330.3
Missouri
5%
61%
56%
26.1
2,141.0
2,115.0
Montana
9%
61%
52%
3.0
2,004.4
2,001.5
Nebraska
6%
51%
45%
5.4
2,802.8
2,797.5
Nevada
5%
65%
60%
1.4
3,633.1
3,631.7
New Hampshire
3%
15%
12%
63.6
1,260.6
1,197.0
New Jersey
2%
21%
19%
104.4
2,901.0
2,796.6
New Mexico
9%
61%
52%
3.7
2,072.2
2,068.5
New York
0%
17%
17%
52.0
4,235.4
4,183.4
North Carolina
1%
20%
19%
74.9
1,479.9
1,405.0
North Dakota
2%
37%
35%
3.3
2,522.7
2,519.4
Ohio
2%
31%
29%
68.3
2,060.7
1,992.3
Oklahoma
9%
66%
57%
18.3
2,027.9
2,009.5
Oregon
5%
37%
32%
7.5
2,969.7
2,962.2
Pennsylvania
3%
20%
17%
67.5
2,162.3
2,094.8
Rhode Island
2%
2%
0%
154.0
2,377.9
2,223.9
South Carolina
8%
38%
30%
56.7
1,385.1
1,328.3
South Dakota
2%
26%
24%
4.3
2,299.5
2,295.2
Tennessee
2%
34%
32%
56.6
1,529.0
1,472.4
Texas
5%
46%
41%
15.2
2,643.6
2,628.4
Utah
3%
39%
36%
3.2
2,973.1
2,969.8
Vermont
2%
27%
25%
41.9
1,609.9
1,568.0
Virginia
3%
38%
35%
53.5
2,403.7
2,350.2
Washington
1%
14%
13%
17.0
2,520.7
2,503.7
West Virginia
10%
48%
38%
40.9
1,429.7
1,388.8
Wisconsin
1%
43%
42%
31.9
2,204.3
2,172.4
Wyoming
3%
63%
60%
2.1
2,001.6
1,999.5
Source: FCC 2016 Broadband Report




No comments:

Post a Comment