The media marketplace has changed significantly over
the past decade, including more consumer choices for how, where, and when we
watch video programs. Content has always
been king, but with alternative distribution channels available (e.g. internet,
mobile), even more power has shifted to broadcasters in retransmission negotiations. Without surprise, distributors are none too
happy and are trying to wield their considerable influence with the FCC to get
things changed….all under the guise of protecting the interests of consumers.
So, while the number of program disruptions resulting
from retransmission disputes have increased in recent years, without that
threat and reality, we have to ask: who would be better off? Maybe consumers would be in the short-run. But, they have choices and could ultimately
take their business elsewhere. MVPDs, on
the other hand….
Some background:
Section
325(b) of the 1934 Communications Act (as amended in 1992) requires cable
systems and other pay television services to obtain a television station’s
“retransmission consent” before carrying the station’s signal. Broadcasters and MVPDs are required to negotiate
these market-based agreements in good
faith and minimize programming service disruptions (“blackouts”). Violations
of good faith negotiations can be determined as either per se breaches or in the
totality of the circumstances.
And, now:
In
March of 2011, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to
consider possible amendments to these rules, including providing guidance to
the parties on good faith negotiation requirements. With that NPRM still pending, Congress
directed the FCC in the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014 to begin a review of its totality of the circumstances test
for good faith negotiations. Also included in the NPRM, released
in September, was a request for comment on whether there are specific practices
that constitute evidence of bad faith (i.e. preventing online access to
programming, banning networks from negotiating on behalf of affiliate stations,
and bundling broadcast and non-broadcast programming).
No comments:
Post a Comment