In the next week or so on this blog, I want to look at major
issues in the media/telecom space and predict, with some analysis, what might
happen in 2019. First up is net neutrality.
What will the new Congress, comprised of a Republican
majority in the Senate and now a Democrat majority in the House mean to changes
in net neutrality rules/regulations? The
answer…. nothing. While federal legislation
may pass the Senate with help from the three Republican senators who voted last
year in favor of overturning the FCC’s net neutrality decision using the
Congressional Review Authority (CRA) and it will pass in the House with the
Democrats pushing it through, President Trump will support FCC Chairman Pai and
veto the legislation. That means nothing
changes at the federal level until at least 2021 when there is possible change
in the White House. By then, a
reassessment of the web landscape will be necessary and may make the rules as
proscribed in 2015-2017 unnecessary or different.
That leaves things up to the states. Last January, twenty-one states* and the
District of Columbia filed a protective petition for review in the United
States Court of Appeals, D.C., seeking a determination that the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order “is
arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion…” and therefore request that
the Court “hold unlawful, vacate, enjoin, and set aside the Order”. This case is expected to go to oral arguments
before three judges (1 Republican and 2 Democratic appointees) in February. The decision will provide a critical pivot
point on the issue. If the states win,
expect a continuation of EOs and laws passed and enacted at the state level, particularly
in BLUE states. If the FCC wins, expect
more court battles, particularly on whether the FCC can preempt states from
enacting their own net neutrality rules. (Note: in 2018, a handful of states signed
Executive Orders (EOs) and passed legislation that advanced net neutrality
principles. Except for Vermont, the small
number of states that passed EOs and laws had democratic governors.)
Signees of Protective Petition for Review*
|
Governor
|
|
State
|
Rep
|
Dem
|
California
|
1
|
|
Connecticut
|
1
|
|
Delaware
|
1
|
|
Hawaii
|
1
|
|
Illinois
|
1
|
|
Iowa
|
1
|
|
Kentucky
|
1
|
|
Maine
|
1
|
|
Maryland
|
1
|
|
Massachusetts
|
1
|
|
Minnesota
|
1
|
|
Mississippi
|
1
|
|
New Mexico
|
1
|
|
New York
|
1
|
|
North Carolina
|
1
|
|
Oregon
|
1
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
1
|
|
Rhode Island
|
1
|
|
Vermont
|
1
|
|
Virginia
|
1
|
|
Washington
|
1
|
|
D.C.
|
|
|
6
|
15
|
No comments:
Post a Comment